The legal reasoning passages of CLAT primarily assess a candidate's interest in legal awareness and legal aptitude—about how acquainted and well-balanced the aspirant’s brain is for a legal career.
The legal passages in CLAT assess the aspirant's legal knowledge. In fact, this is one section that directly pictures the aspirant's life in an NLU. Hence, candidates are required to perform well in this segment of the test to pass CLAT.
Legal is one section that is not taught in school so an aspirant has to start from scratch for its preparation. Although no prior legal training is necessary for the CLAT legal reasoning section, aspirants must have a conceptual comprehension of laws and moral principles to answer the questions properly.
CLAT's legal reasoning section includes several passages. While attempting these legal passages for CLAT, aspirants should keep the following things in mind:
This article covers all you need to know about this crucial section and how to prepare for legal reasoning for CLAT.
Here is a basic overview of the legal reasoning section of CLAT.
|
Legal Reasoning for CLAT 2026 |
|
|
Total number of Legal Reasoning Passages in CLAT |
4-6 |
|
Number of questions in Legal Reasoning |
28-32 |
|
Marks |
28-32 |
|
Weightage of Legal Reasoning in CLAT |
25% |
|
Negative Marking |
0.25 marks for each incorrect response. |
These key points are a must-know for the Legal Reasoning section in CLAT 2026 to perform well.
In the event of a tie in CLAT scores, candidates with better scores in the Legal Reasoning portion would be given first preference.
|
Year |
Overall Difficulty Level |
Type of Passages |
Good Attempt |
Good Score |
|
CLAT 2023 |
Moderate |
Balanced mix of legal and general reasoning passages |
26–28 |
22–23 |
|
CLAT 2024 |
Moderate to Difficult |
Concept-based passages on Constitutional and Tort Law |
25–27 |
21–22 |
|
CLAT 2025 |
Easy to Moderate |
Current affairs-based passages and application questions |
28–30 |
25–26 |
|
CLAT 2026 (Expected) |
Moderate |
Case-based + Legal principle interpretation |
27–29 |
23–25 |
As the number of questions keeps changing in each of the sections in CLAT every year, one must take a look back at the previous year to achieve a true picture of this section.
To know an in-depth analysis of all the sections across the years, refer to CLAT Exam Analysis.
The syllabus for CLAT Legal Reasoning has been similar for a few years. As it is considered one of the most important sections to clear the CLAT exam, aspirants are advised to know the syllabus of CLAT Legal Reasoning thoroughly.
While it is nearly tough to enumerate all the topics for Legal Reasoning here, we have tried to jot down the most important legal reasoning topics that a CLAT aspirant must read.
|
CLAT Legal Reasoning Important Topics |
|
|
Topics |
Details |
|
Constitution of India |
|
|
Leading Case Laws & Supreme Court Judgements |
|
|
Law of Torts |
|
|
Contract/Civil Law |
|
|
Important Legal Terms |
|
|
Legal Maxims |
|
|
Criminal Law |
|
|
Legal GK |
|
|
Important Treaties & Conventions |
|
|
International Laws & IPR |
|
|
Famous Indian Cases & Lawyers |
|
|
Famous Doctrines |
|
This was just the syllabus for CLAT Legal reasoning, if you want a complete picture of the syllabus, refer to CLAT Syllabus.
Here are some important dos & don’ts to remember while preparing for CLAT legal reasoning.
|
Do’s |
Don’ts |
|
First, read and understand the passage thoroughly before attempting the questions. |
Don’t start by reading the hypothetical circumstance — it may bias your interpretation. |
|
Focus on understanding the author’s point of view and reasoning. |
Avoid imposing your personal opinions or external knowledge while answering. |
|
Always choose the answer that directly relates to the passage or given principle. |
Don’t pick options that are based on assumptions or external facts. |
|
Keep your emotions aside and approach every question logically and objectively. |
Don’t let emotional reasoning influence your interpretation of legal principles. |
|
Base your answers strictly on the facts and principles provided in the question. |
Do not assume, extend, or add facts beyond the information mentioned in the passage. |
The Legal Reasoning section carries a quarter of the overall marks in CLAT 2026 and is the deciding factor in a tie-breaker. This makes it the most important section in the entire exam.
Proper preparation is needed without it passing this section becomes very hard, especially with the negative marking in the exam.
Here are some expert-prepared tips candidates can follow to ace the CLAT Legal Reasoning section.
Approximately, a total of 28-32 questions will be asked from the Legal Reasoning section of the exam. As a result, candidates should pay special attention to the important topics of the section, as they form the majority of the questions asked.
Some of the important topics in this section are as follows:
Knowing the pattern is also an important part of CLAT Legal Reasoning preparation. As a fact, aspirants are required to know all the details of the CLAT 2026 Syllabus to understand the exam pattern and list of important topics for all sections.
Solving legal passages for CLAT can help you enhance your speed and accuracy on the day of the final test and earn high points. It will also help understand the paper's difficulty level and the types of questions offered on the exam.
Mock examinations allow aspirants to assess the level of preparation and identify areas for improvement. Practicing mock examinations will help you improve your time management and confidence. The most crucial aspect is to analyze the mocks and the faults you make in the legal awareness for CLAT, which is the longest.
As the competition for the CLAT exam grows tremendously, aspirants must put up their best effort to compete and succeed. Effective time management is essential for achieving a good entrance test rank. It will also help build confidence, create goals, and reduce stress.
The following are some of the time management tips that can help improve legal reasoning and legal awareness.
Work on your reading abilities regularly. Make a note of the following things on your to-do list:
Under the cover of darkness, and with the aid of police, two women in their 40s prayed at the Sabarimala temple in Kerala on Wednesday, avoiding thousands of protesters who have stopped others from doing so. The day before, a chain of hundreds of thousands of women stretched 620km across the southern state, supporting the right to enter the shrine. Three months after the Indian Supreme Court's landmark ruling lifted the bar on their entry, and years after the dispute began, this will not end the matter; violent protests erupted after the visit.
While many Hindu temples bar women who are menstruating, regarding them as unclean, Sabarimala has historically barred all women between 10 and 50 years old. Supporters of the ban argue that this respects the wishes of the deity enshrined there, Lord Ayyappa, who took an oath of celibacy. But it has been challenged repeatedly. Religious faith is deeply rooted. Many women have objected to granting women access. The only supreme court judge to dissent on the ruling (the sole woman) argued that a secular polity should not ordinarily interfere with religious practice, even if irrational.
But tradition and religion are not only a matter of beliefs shared by a community; they embody its power relations. Men are most often those who decree the acceptable boundaries of belief and practice, and are frequently swift to reject any challenge as the result of outside interference. The Supreme Court ruling - the latest of several bold and commendable judgments - makes it clear that it is precisely about the right of Hindus, in this case women, to practise their religion as they believe they should.
Women seeking to visit the shrine see not faith but misogyny as the obstacle. They understand that tradition and belief evolve. Temple entry campaigns have been a powerful part of broader social reform movements; these campaigners have bravely taken on patriarchal norms in a society that has often enforced them through violence and where political leaders have offered little leadership. The relatives of one visitor are reportedly in a safe house. Conflicting and deeply held beliefs are not quickly reconciled. Yet the Supreme Court allowed politicians to advance much-needed social reform.
(Extracted, with edits and revisions, from 'The Guardian view on India's temple dispute: faith and politics', Editorial by The Guardian, January 3, 2019)
What are the reasons, as per the author, that stopped women of menstruating age from entering temples?
a. Women are quite fragile and may not be able to climb temples located on mountains like the Sabrimala Temple of Kerala.
b. Women themselves never wanted to go to the temple, as during ancient and medieval times, they were primarily responsible for household chores.
c. Patriarchy and age-old beliefs, which developed into culture and were enforced in Hindu society.
d. There was a Central Law which prohibited any woman from entering a temple in India.
Here are some expert-recommended books to help you prepare for CLAT 2026 Legal Reasoning.
|
Legal Reasoning Books for CLAT |
|
|
Legal Awareness and Legal Reasoning |
Pearson |
|
Legal Aptitude and Legal Reasoning |
A P Bhardwaj |
|
Objective Legal Aptitude |
R.S Aggarwal |
To conclude, a comprehensive study for legal reasoning for CLAT, or legal reasoning for law entrances in general, is critical to exam success. Using the appropriate tactics and approaches can improve your legal reasoning abilities and overall performance.
As we conclude the post, here are the main points to remember from the CLAT Legal Reasoning section.