Given below is the section-wise breakup of the paper, the good attempts, and good score:
|
Section |
No. of Questions |
Good Attempts |
Good Score |
Difficulty Level |
|
English Language |
24 |
22–23 |
~20 |
Easy–Moderate |
|
General Knowledge |
28 |
24–25 |
20–21 |
Easy–Moderate |
|
Legal Reasoning |
30 |
26–27 |
~25 |
Easy–Moderate |
|
Logical Reasoning |
26 |
20–21 |
17–18 |
Moderate–High |
|
Quantitative Techniques |
12 |
7–8 |
6 |
Moderate–High |
The English section was easy to moderate, with 5 RCs based on historical, philosophical, and literature-based extracts, making it fairly predictable and manageable.
The GK section was easy to moderate, staying current affairs-focused rather than static, with most questions drawn from high-visibility news events of the past 8-12 months.
Legal Reasoning was easy to moderate, though the number of passages increased from 5 to 6, making the section slightly lengthier.
Logical Reasoning was the toughest section of CLAT 2026, rated moderate to high in difficulty.
Quantitative Techniques was moderate to high in difficulty, with only two DI sets, but Set 1 was extremely time-consuming.