Overall CLAT 2025 Exam Analysis
Given below is the section-wise breakup of the paper, the ideal attempts, and good score:
|
Section |
No. of Questions |
No. of Passages |
Ideal Attempts |
Difficulty Level |
|
English Language |
24 |
4 |
24 |
Easy |
|
Current Affairs, including General Knowledge |
28 |
5 |
25 |
Easy |
|
Legal Reasoning |
32 |
6 |
30 |
Easy |
|
Logical Reasoning |
24 |
4 |
19 |
Moderate |
|
Quantitative Techniques |
12 |
2 |
9 |
Moderate |
CLAT 2025 Exam Highlights
- The overall paper was very student-friendly with direct passages and simple comprehension.
- English and GK were straightforward and scoring.
- Quantitative Techniques was the only lengthy section, involving calculations and interpretation.
- Legal Reasoning passages were shorter and mostly static.
- Around 110+ attempts could easily place a candidate in top NLUs.
Section-Wise CLAT 2025 Analysis
The English section was easy and predictable, with all passages being short and easy to comprehend. Most questions were direct inference or vocabulary-based.
- All 4 passages were straightforward and readable.
- Questions involved direct reasoning, tone, and summary-based tasks.
- Students with regular reading practice found this section effortless.
This section was again easy and well-balanced. The questions were based on contemporary topics and some static GK from history and governance.
- Passages were short and based on predictable topics.
- Included a balanced mix of static and current affairs.
- It could easily be answered from the passage context itself.
Legal Reasoning continued to be the most scoring section in CLAT 2025. Most passages tested conceptual understanding of basic principles and recent legal updates.
- Overall easy paper with moderate-length passages.
- 3 passages were current, 3 were static.
- Required understanding of context more than memory.
- Extra knowledge of legal concepts helped with close options.
The Logical Reasoning section was moderate, with a few tricky inference questions. One passage on circular reasoning was slightly challenging.
- Most passages were direct and comprehension-based.
- Questions tested the conclusion, assumption, and argument strength.
- One passage was time-consuming.
Quant was moderate and lengthy, but solvable with logical thinking. The sets were calculation-heavy, and one new format appeared this year.
- The first set was lengthy but straightforward.
- The second set had questions in a true/false format.
- Topics: Percentage Difference, Distribution, Ratio, and Data Interpretation.